Matter of New York Municipal Railway Corp. v. . Holliday
127 N.E. 917, 228 N.Y. 561, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1024
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of New York Municipal Railway Corp. v. . Holliday, 127 N.E. 917, 228 N.Y. 561, 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1024 (N.Y. 1920).
127 N.E. 917 (Matter of New York Municipal Railway Corp. v. . Holliday) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Copeland v. Salomon
436 N.E.2d 1284 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Meredith
63 Misc. 2d 819 (New York Supreme Court, 1970)
Wildermuth v. Pious
21 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Topping v. Town of Mamaroneck
5 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
In re Bronx Parkway Commission
191 A.D. 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)