Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, Hackshaw v. ABB
This text of Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, Hackshaw v. ABB (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, Hackshaw v. ABB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 106 SSM 14 In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation. -------------------------------- Dorcas Hackshaw, &c., Appellant, v. ABB, Inc., &c., et al., Defendants, Crane Co., Respondent.
Submitted by Alani Golanski, for appellant. Submitted by Eric R. I. Cottle, for respondent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute dismissing the complaint granted upon plaintiff's stipulation. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Appellate Division's reversal involved an error of law and, therefore, this Court is bound to affirm and render judgment absolute (see CPLR 5615). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.
Decided June 22, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, Hackshaw v. ABB, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-new-york-city-asbestos-litigation-hackshaw-v-abb-ny-2017.