Matter of Nelson v. Minardo

125 A.D.3d 778, 999 N.Y.S.2d 763
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 2015
Docket2014-11899
StatusPublished

This text of 125 A.D.3d 778 (Matter of Nelson v. Minardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Nelson v. Minardo, 125 A.D.3d 778, 999 N.Y.S.2d 763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit Philip G. Minardo, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, from, inter alia, vacating a prior order of the same court dated August 5, 2011.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner failed to establish a clear legal right to relief in the nature of prohibition.

Rivera, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.D.3d 778, 999 N.Y.S.2d 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-nelson-v-minardo-nyappdiv-2015.