Matter of Nelson

2016 NY Slip Op 6990, 145 A.D.3d 38, 39 N.Y.S.3d 764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 25, 2016
DocketM-4381
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 6990 (Matter of Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Nelson, 2016 NY Slip Op 6990, 145 A.D.3d 38, 39 N.Y.S.3d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Danial A. Nelson was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on September 24, 2007. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) now seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), on the ground that he has been automatically disbarred upon his conviction of a New York State felony.

On February 26, 2016, respondent was convicted, after trial, in Supreme Court, New York County, of sexual abuse in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 130.65 (1), a class D felony, and criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation in violation of Penal Law § 121.11 (a), a class A misdemeanor.

On June 10, 2016, respondent was sentenced to a four-year term of incarceration, three years of supervised release, fines and surcharges, and was required to register as a sex offender.

Respondent’s conviction of a felony within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e) constitutes a ground for automatic disbarment pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and his name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys (see Matter of Ugweches, 69 AD3d 125 [1st Dept 2009]).

Accordingly the Committee’s petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to February 26, 2016.

Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Gische and Kahn, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred, and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to February 26, 2016.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ugweches
69 A.D.3d 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 6990, 145 A.D.3d 38, 39 N.Y.S.3d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-nelson-nyappdiv-2016.