Matter of Natina F. (Zena F.)
This text of 122 A.D.3d 437 (Matter of Natina F. (Zena F.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered January 18, 2013, which, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant mother permanently neglected the subject children, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of them to petitioner and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly found that clear and convincing evidence demonstrated that despite the agency’s diligent efforts to reunite the mother with the children, the mother permanently neglected the children based on the facts that although she had completed a multitude of programs and engaged in mental health therapy, she never developed the ability to empathize with or understand the children, and that she had exposed her then three year old son to the home birth of a sibling, rather than comply with the Agency direction to return him to the foster home prior to the birth.
The court properly found that a preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that it was in the best interests of the children to terminate the mother’s parental rights to free them for adoption by their foster mother. One of the children has lived in the foster home for almost seven years, since she was 19 months old, and was thriving. The other child was recently placed in the home, and his needs were being addressed by the foster mother, who wanted to adopt him. A suspended judgement was not warranted given the mother’s failure to progress in the seven years since placement of the older child.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D.3d 437, 995 N.Y.S.2d 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-natina-f-zena-f-nyappdiv-2014.