Matter of Murray v. . H.P. Cummings Construction Company
134 N.E. 549, 232 N.Y. 507, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 526
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Gardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Murray v. . H.P. Cummings Construction Company, 134 N.E. 549, 232 N.Y. 507, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 526 (N.Y. 1921).
134 N.E. 549 (Matter of Murray v. . H.P. Cummings Construction Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meyer v. Roettele
264 N.W. 191 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1935)
Kripplaben v. Jos. Greenspon's Sons Iron & Steel Co.
50 S.W.2d 752 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1932)
King v. Buckeye Cotton Oil Co.
296 S.W. 3 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1927)
Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.
147 N.E. 366 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)