MATTER OF MUNNELLY v. Newkirk
716 N.E.2d 182, 93 N.Y.2d 960, 694 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3487
This text of 716 N.E.2d 182 (MATTER OF MUNNELLY v. Newkirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MATTER OF MUNNELLY v. Newkirk, 716 N.E.2d 182, 93 N.Y.2d 960, 694 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3487 (N.Y. 1999).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (262 AD2d 781).
Concur; Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
MAX, JR., FRANK C. v. WARD, DENNIS E.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
Max v. Ward
107 A.D.3d 1597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Weiner v. McCord
264 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
716 N.E.2d 182, 93 N.Y.2d 960, 694 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 3487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-munnelly-v-newkirk-ny-1999.