Matter of Mullen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Matter of Mullen

144 A.2d 919, 1958 D.C. App. LEXIS 332

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 2, 1958

Docket1960

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.2d 919 (Matter of Mullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Mullen, 144 A.2d 919, 1958 D.C. App. LEXIS 332 (D.C. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding brought in the Juvenile Court under the provisions of Code 1951, §§ 11-906(a) (6) and 11-907, subd. 1(a). These sections authorize the court to determine whether children under eighteen years of age are without adequate parental care. After a full hearing the court found that Frank Eugene Mullen, five years of age, and Mary Alice Mullen, age three, the children of George E. and Carolyn Phillips Mullen, were without adequate parental care, and pursuant to the authority of Code 1951, § 11-915(2) (Supp. VI), committed them to the Board of Public Welfare for one year. This appeal followed.

We have carefully studied the record, as well as the voluminous briefs and other documents filed by the mother of the children. We are convinced that the court committed no errors of law and that there was ample evidence to support its finding.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding brought in the Juvenile Court under the provisions of Code 1951, §§ 11-906(a) (6) and 11-907, subd. 1(a). These sections authorize the court to determine whether children under eighteen years of age are without adequate parental care. After a full hearing the court found that Frank Eugene Mullen, five years of age, and Mary Alice Mullen, age three, the children of George E. and Carolyn Phillips Mullen, were without adequate parental care, and pursuant to the authority of Code 1951, § 11-915(2) (Supp. VI), committed them to the Board of Public Welfare for one year. This appeal followed.

We have carefully studied the record, as well as the voluminous briefs and other documents filed by the mother of the children. We are convinced that the court committed no errors of law and that there was ample evidence to support its finding.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.2d 919, 1958 D.C. App. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mullen-dc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack