Matter of Mooney v. Cohen
4 N.E.2d 821, 272 N.Y. 597, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1086
Opinion
Motion to amend the remittitur granted. When we reversed the Special Term order we reversed the ruling that the questions submitted should not appear on the ballot. We thereby decided that both questions should be placed upon the ballot to be voted on at the coming election. To avoid any further misunderstanding, we add to the remittitur following the words of reversal, “ and the motion to strike both the questions submitted from the ballot is denied, without costs.” (See 272 N. Y. 33.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Mooney v. Cohen, 4 N.E.2d 821, 272 N.Y. 597, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1086 (N.Y. 1936).
4 N.E.2d 821 (Matter of Mooney v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. City of New York
9 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)
Bowe v. Cohen
162 Misc. 913 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)