Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Labor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 22, 2026·No. 2024-07464·Published

Opinion

Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Labor - 2026 NY Slip Op 04503
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc. v New York State Dept. of Labor

2026 NY Slip Op 04503

July 22, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

In the Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc., appellant,

v

New York State Department of Labor, respondent.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on July 22, 2026

2024-07464, (Index No. 708620/23)

Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.

Helen Voutsinas

Janice A. Taylor

Phillip Hom, JJ.

Leavitt Kerson & Sehati, Forest Hills, NY (Paul E. Kerson of counsel), for appellant.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Judith N. Vale and Anthony R. Raduazo of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Labor dated October 31, 2017, which assessed unemployment insurance contributions and a penalty against the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cassandra A. Johnson, J.), entered March 29, 2024. The order and judgment granted the motion of the New York State Department of Labor pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) and 7804(f) to dismiss the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the New York State Department of Labor pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) and 7804(f) to dismiss the petition and, in effect, dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner failed to serve the Attorney General in accordance with CPLR 7804(c) (see Matter of Polletta v McLauhlin, 201 AD3d 723, 723-724; Matter of Reillo v New York State Thruway Authority 159 AD3d 993, 994; Matter of Williams v Zambelli, 125 AD3d 678).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

CHAMBERS, J.P., VOUTSINAS, TAYLOR and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Labor, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Labor (Matter of Molla Auto Sales, Inc. v. New York State Dept. of Labor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Williams v. Zambelli
125 A.D.3d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Polletta v. McLoughlin
201 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)