MATTER OF MOHR v. Schroeder
This text of 655 N.E.2d 701 (MATTER OF MOHR v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of Ralph M. Mohr, a Commissioner of the Erie County Board of Elections, Respondent,
v.
Harold W. Schroeder et al., Respondents, and Beverly A. Mazur, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Jasen, Jasen & Sampson, Buffalo (Mark Matthew Jasen of counsel), for appellant.
Offermann, Cassano, Pigott & Greco, Buffalo (Eugene F. Pigott, Jr., of counsel), for Ralph M. Mohr, a Commissioner of the Erie County Board of Elections, respondent.
Albrecht, Maguire, Heffern & Gregg, P. C., Buffalo (John M. Curran of counsel), for Harold W. Schroeder, respondent.
Kenneth A. Schoetz, County Attorney of Erie County, Buffalo, for Erie County Board of Elections, respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.
Order reversed and order of Supreme Court, Erie County, reinstated for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Mario J. Rossetti at Supreme Court (162 Misc 2d 584).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 N.E.2d 701, 86 N.Y.2d 786, 631 N.Y.S.2d 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mohr-v-schroeder-ny-1995.