Matter of Modell v. Kelly

126 A.D.3d 637, 4 N.Y.S.3d 492
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 2015
Docket14648 101061/13
StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.3d 637 (Matter of Modell v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Modell v. Kelly, 126 A.D.3d 637, 4 N.Y.S.3d 492 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated April 1, 2013, finding that petitioner police officer engaged in conduct prejudicial to the good order, efficiency or discipline of the police department by soliciting the assistance of other officers in preventing the prosecution of summonses issued to other individuals on two occasions between September 2010 and September 2011, and imposing a penalty of one year of suspended-dismissal probation, five days of suspension, and the forfeiture of 25 vacation days, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme *638 Court, New York County [Cynthia S. Kern, J.], entered Nov. 21, 2013), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that petitioner asked other officers for help in preventing the prosecution of summonses issued to other individuals on two occasions between September 2010 and September 2011 (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443 [1987]). The inference of the hearing officer that petitioner engaged in this conduct on two occasions is rationally based on petitioner’s admission that he requested of another officer that a summons be “taken care of” “[a] couple of times” during that period. We see no basis in the record for disturbing the hearing officer’s credibility findings (see Matter of Berenhaus, 70 NY2d at 443).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berenhaus v. Ward
517 N.E.2d 193 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D.3d 637, 4 N.Y.S.3d 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-modell-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2015.