Matter of Minkin v. New York State Tax Comm'n

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Minkin v. New York State Tax Comm'n

385 N.E.2d 1041, 45 N.Y.2d 991, 413 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2403

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 28, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 385 N.E.2d 1041 (Matter of Minkin v. New York State Tax Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Minkin v. New York State Tax Comm'n, 385 N.E.2d 1041, 45 N.Y.2d 991, 413 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2403 (N.Y. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs. It is true that under the statute and regulations maintenance of an office or space solely for the display of merchandise or the maintenance of records shall not be deemed an office for the purpose of imposing the unincorporated business tax (Tax Law, § 703, subd [f]; 20 NYCRR 203.14). Nevertheless a key factor determining the power to impose the tax is the "principal’s” exercise of direction and control; that factor in the nature of things is generally a question of fact resolvable by the Tax Commission beyond review by the courts (20 NYCRR 203.14 [d] [1]; Matter of Liberman v Gallman, 41 NY2d 774, 778-779). The purported inconsistencies in the handling of appellant’s Social Security deductions, unemployment insurance status, voluntary retirement plan, and personal income taxes, while cogent factors to be considered by the Tax Commission, are not conclusive as a matter of law sufficient to undermine the commission’s determination.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs. It is true that under the statute and regulations maintenance of an office or space solely for the display of merchandise or the maintenance of records shall not be deemed an office for the purpose of imposing the unincorporated business tax (Tax Law, § 703, subd [f]; 20 NYCRR 203.14). Nevertheless a key factor determining the power to impose the tax is the "principal’s” exercise of direction and control; that factor in the nature of things is generally a question of fact resolvable by the Tax Commission beyond review by the courts (20 NYCRR 203.14 [d] [1]; Matter of Liberman v Gallman, 41 NY2d 774, 778-779). The purported inconsistencies in the handling of appellant’s Social Security deductions, unemployment insurance status, voluntary retirement plan, and personal income taxes, while cogent factors to be considered by the Tax Commission, are not conclusive as a matter of law sufficient to undermine the commission’s determination.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 N.E.2d 1041, 45 N.Y.2d 991, 413 N.Y.S.2d 113, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-minkin-v-new-york-state-tax-commn-ny-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack