Matter of Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Association
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 73 SSM 2 In the Matter of Ming Tung, et al., Appellants, v.
China Buddhist Association, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Alexander P. Kelly, for appellants. Submitted by Joseph Milano, for respondents.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided February 18, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Association (Matter of Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.