Matter of Mike R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Mike R.

121 A.D.3d 433, 993 N.Y.S.2d 33

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 2014·No. 13082·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of disposition, *434 Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about May 14, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The record supports the inference that when appellant threw a crate of books at a teacher, he intended to cause physical injury, a natural and likely consequence of such an act (see generally People v Getch, 50 NY2d 456, 465 [1980]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and placing him on probation rather than ordering an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. Probation was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The court properly concluded that appellant was in need of the supervision that would be provided by way of a 12-month term of probation. Among other things, the underlying incident was violent, and appellant has a history of violent and aggressive behavior.

We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining claims.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, *434 Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about May 14, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The record supports the inference that when appellant threw a crate of books at a teacher, he intended to cause physical injury, a natural and likely consequence of such an act (see generally People v Getch, 50 NY2d 456, 465 [1980]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and placing him on probation rather than ordering an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. Probation was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The court properly concluded that appellant was in need of the supervision that would be provided by way of a 12-month term of probation. Among other things, the underlying incident was violent, and appellant has a history of violent and aggressive behavior.

We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining claims.

Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.

Matter of Mike R., 121 A.D.3d 433, 993 N.Y.S.2d 33 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

121 A.D.3d 433 (Matter of Mike R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related