Matter of Michael Angelo D. (AbbyAnn D.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Michael Angelo D. (AbbyAnn D.)

2017 NY Slip Op 926, 147 A.D.3d 446, 46 N.Y.S.3d 583

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2017·No. 3006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about November 19, 2015, which, upon a finding of abandonment, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject child, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of abandonment was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The record demonstrates that respondent failed to communicate or visit with the child or the agency during the six months immediately preceding the filing of the petition (see Matter of Amin Enrique M., 52 AD3d 316 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 792 [2009]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying respondent’s request for a full dispositional hearing following its finding of abandonment, as such a hearing is not statutorily required (see Matter of Keyevon Justice P. [Lativia Denice P.], 90 AD3d 477 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Saxe, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about November 19, 2015, which, upon a finding of abandonment, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject child, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of abandonment was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The record demonstrates that respondent failed to communicate or visit with the child or the agency during the six months immediately preceding the filing of the petition (see Matter of Amin Enrique M., 52 AD3d 316 [1st Dept 2008], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 792 [2009]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying respondent’s request for a full dispositional hearing following its finding of abandonment, as such a hearing is not statutorily required (see Matter of Keyevon Justice P. [Lativia Denice P.], 90 AD3d 477 [1st Dept 2011]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Saxe, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.

Matter of Michael Angelo D. (AbbyAnn D.), 2017 NY Slip Op 926, 147 A.D.3d 446, 46 N.Y.S.3d 583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 926 (Matter of Michael Angelo D. (AbbyAnn D.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related