Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF McNULTY v. State Liquor Auth.

MATTER OF McNULTY v. State Liquor Auth.

213 N.E.2d 802, 17 N.Y.2d 434
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 30, 1965
StatusPublished

This text of 213 N.E.2d 802 (MATTER OF McNULTY v. State Liquor Auth.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF McNULTY v. State Liquor Auth., 213 N.E.2d 802, 17 N.Y.2d 434 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

17 N.Y.2d 434 (1965)

In the Matter of Theodore P. McNulty, Respondent,
v.
State Liquor Authority et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 22, 1965.
Decided December 30, 1965.

Emanuel D. Black and Hyman Amsel for State Liquor Authority, appellant.

Lester S. Bardack for Barmat Corp., appellant.

David Bornstein for respondent.

Monroe I. Katcher, II, for Metropolitan Package Store Association, Inc., amicus curiae.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNulty v. State Liquor Authority
213 N.E.2d 802 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 N.E.2d 802, 17 N.Y.2d 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mcnulty-v-state-liquor-auth-ny-1965.