Matter of McKeever v. Corrigan
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1073 (Matter of McKeever v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of McKeever v Corrigan |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 01073 |
| Decided on February 13, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 13, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
RUTH C. BALKIN
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
2018-10749 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT
v
Theresa K. Corrigan, etc., et al., respondents.
Victor McKeever, East Meadow, NY, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), respondent pro se, and for respondent Theresa K. Corrigan.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Theresa K. Corrigan, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, to vacate an order dated April 23, 2018, made in a criminal action entitled People v McKeever , pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Indictment No. 2037/15, and to dismiss the indictment, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman , 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 1073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mckeever-v-corrigan-nyappdiv-2019.