Matter of McGrath v. Healey

2018 NY Slip Op 662
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2018
Docket58 CAF 16-01430
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 662 (Matter of McGrath v. Healey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of McGrath v. Healey, 2018 NY Slip Op 662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of McGrath v Healey (2018 NY Slip Op 00662)
Matter of McGrath v Healey
2018 NY Slip Op 00662
Decided on February 2, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 2, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

58 CAF 16-01430

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ALEXANDRIA G. MCGRATH, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

JOHNATHON J. HEALEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.


DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Deanne M. Tripi, J.), entered August 2, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order, among other things, revoked a suspended sentence imposed for respondent's admitted willful violation of a child support order and committed him to jail for 90 days.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order revoking a suspended sentence imposed for his admitted willful violation of a child support order and committing him to jail for 90 days. Inasmuch as respondent concedes that he has served his sentence, the instant appeal is moot (see Matter of Davis v Williams, 133 AD3d 1354, 1355 [4th Dept 2015]; Matter of St. Lawrence County Dept. of Soc. Servs. v Pratt, 24 AD3d 1050, 1050 [3d Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). To the extent that respondent contends that this appeal is not moot because a finding of contempt and willful violation may have significant collateral consequences for him, we note that he did not appeal from the order finding him in willful violation of the order requiring him to pay child support (see Davis, 133 AD3d at 1355; St. Lawrence County Dept. of Soc. Servs., 24 AD3d at 1050; cf. Matter of Bickwid v Deutsch, 87 NY2d 862, 863 [1995]).

Entered: February 2, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bickwid v. Deutsch
662 N.E.2d 250 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Davis v. Williams
133 A.D.3d 1354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mcgrath-v-healey-nyappdiv-2018.