Matter of McGorman v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of McGorman v. Klein

2017 NY Slip Op 6976, 154 A.D.3d 725, 60 N.Y.S.3d 846

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 4, 2017

Docket2017-06003

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 6976 (Matter of McGorman v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of McGorman v. Klein, 2017 NY Slip Op 6976, 154 A.D.3d 725, 60 N.Y.S.3d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Carol S. Klein, a Judge of the Family Court and an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Orange County, to produce a certified transcript of a family offense proceeding entitled Matter of McGorman v McGorman, commenced in the Family Court, Orange County, under docket No. 0-00068-16.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]; Matter of Tonawanda Seneca Nation v Noonan, 27 NY3d 713 [2016]).

Eng, P.J., Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Carol S. Klein, a Judge of the Family Court and an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Orange County, to produce a certified transcript of a family offense proceeding entitled Matter of McGorman v McGorman, commenced in the Family Court, Orange County, under docket No. 0-00068-16.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]; Matter of Tonawanda Seneca Nation v Noonan, 27 NY3d 713 [2016]).

Eng, P.J., Hinds-Radix, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 6976, 154 A.D.3d 725, 60 N.Y.S.3d 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mcgorman-v-klein-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack