Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick

194 N.E. 406, 266 N.Y. 199, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1357

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 194 N.E. 406 (Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of McCarthy v. McGoldrick, 194 N.E. 406, 266 N.Y. 199, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1357 (N.Y. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By a written instrument dated March 1, 1933, petitioner, for a consideration, agreed that he *200 waived the salary of deputy chief of the fire department of the city of New York during the emergency declared to exist by chapter 637 of the Laws of 1932, and that he accepted pay at the lower rate of a battalion chief’s salary, “ said rate of pay to continue during the period of the emergency or unless and until the Board of Estimate and Apportionment shall provide otherwise.” It was not until October 30, 1933, that the Board of Estimate and Apportionment provided otherwise, but, in this proceeding, petitioner has recovered the difference between the salaries of the two ranks -from March 1, 1933, to October 31, 1933. We think that this result is contrary to the terms and intent of the waiver which was executed by petitioner as an inducement to bis appointment to the rank of deputy chief.

The orders should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the motion denied.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Finch, J., not sitting.

Orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By a written instrument dated March 1, 1933, petitioner, for a consideration, agreed that he *200 waived the salary of deputy chief of the fire department of the city of New York during the emergency declared to exist by chapter 637 of the Laws of 1932, and that he accepted pay at the lower rate of a battalion chief’s salary, “ said rate of pay to continue during the period of the emergency or unless and until the Board of Estimate and Apportionment shall provide otherwise.” It was not until October 30, 1933, that the Board of Estimate and Apportionment provided otherwise, but, in this proceeding, petitioner has recovered the difference between the salaries of the two ranks -from March 1, 1933, to October 31, 1933. We think that this result is contrary to the terms and intent of the waiver which was executed by petitioner as an inducement to bis appointment to the rank of deputy chief.

The orders should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the motion denied.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur; Finch, J., not sitting.

Orders reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 N.E. 406, 266 N.Y. 199, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mccarthy-v-mcgoldrick-ny-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack