Matter of McCall v. Annucci
This text of 123 A.D.3d 1267 (Matter of McCall v. Annucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner became disruptive as he approached a gate emptying into the prison yard, and he struck a correction officer with his shoulder as he walked through the gate. He then punched the officer and had to be subdued. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent *1268 conduct and creating a disturbance. He pleaded guilty to creating a disturbance and, at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of the remaining charges. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony of the correction officer who was involved in the altercation provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Alsaifullah v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1239, 1240 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 906 [2014]; Matter of Wright v Fischer, 98 AD3d 759, 759 [2012]). Although petitioner and his witness offered a differing account of the incident, their testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see id.). Finally, petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer erred in denying his request for the medical records of the officer involved in the assault is unavailing, as there was no allegation that petitioner caused any physical injury to the officer. Under these circumstances, the medical records were irrelevant.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A.D.3d 1267, 996 N.Y.S.2d 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-mccall-v-annucci-nyappdiv-2014.