Matter of Masoud

2021 NY Slip Op 03902, 145 N.Y.S.3d 880, 195 A.D.3d 1301
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 17, 2021
DocketPM-88-21
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03902 (Matter of Masoud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Masoud, 2021 NY Slip Op 03902, 145 N.Y.S.3d 880, 195 A.D.3d 1301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Matter of Masoud (2021 NY Slip Op 03902)
Matter of Masoud
2021 NY Slip Op 03902
Decided on June 17, 2021
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:June 17, 2021

PM-88-21

[*1]In the Matter of Sa'adiyah Kanvel Masoud, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4493797.)


Calendar Date:June 14, 2021
Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ.

Sa'adiyah Kanvel Masoud, Boston, Massachusetts, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.



Per Curiam.

Sa'adiyah Kanvel Masoud was admitted to practice by this Court in 2007. Masoud now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) opposes the application by correspondence from its Chief Attorney.

As is noted by AGC, Masoud is presently delinquent in her New York attorney registration requirements, having failed to register for the biennial period beginning in 2021 (see Judiciary Law § 468-a; Rules of the Chief Admin of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 118.1). Inasmuch as Masoud is therefore subject to potential disciplinary action (see Judiciary Law § 468-a [5]; Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]; see also Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 113 AD3d 1020, 1021 [2014]), she is ineligible for nondisciplinary resignation and her application must be denied (see Matter of Cluff, 148 AD3d 1346, 1346 [2017]; Matter of Bomba, 146 AD3d 1226, 1226-1227 [2017]). Further, any future application by Masoud must be supported by proof of her full satisfaction of the requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 118.1 (see Matter of Frank, 146 AD3d 1228, 1228-1229 [2017]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Sa'adiyah Kanvel Masoud's application for permission to resign is denied.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Frank
146 A.D.3d 1228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Bomba
146 A.D.3d 1226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03902, 145 N.Y.S.3d 880, 195 A.D.3d 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-masoud-nyappdiv-2021.