Matter of Martin's Securities Co. v. Walker

181 N.E. 70, 259 N.Y. 120, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 913
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 26, 1932
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 181 N.E. 70 (Matter of Martin's Securities Co. v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Martin's Securities Co. v. Walker, 181 N.E. 70, 259 N.Y. 120, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 913 (N.Y. 1932).

Opinion

*123 Per Curiam.

Mandamus is not the proper remedy. There was no clear, legal duty on the part of the Commissioners of the Sinking Fund to certify the resolution.

The question as to the power of the Comptroller is not decided. (Cf. Matter of Craig v. Matthews, 238 N. Y. 88; Craig v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund, etc., 208 App. Div. 412; McCarthy v. Mills, 214 App. Div. 70.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the County of Nassau
209 N.E.2d 785 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Schweinberger v. Casey
171 Misc. 601 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Lynn
254 A.D. 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.E. 70, 259 N.Y. 120, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-martins-securities-co-v-walker-ny-1932.