Matter of Martin v. Zucker

2020 NY Slip Op 06659, 132 N.Y.S.3d 362, 188 A.D.3d 1680
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 2020
Docket990.2 TP 20-00137
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 06659 (Matter of Martin v. Zucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Martin v. Zucker, 2020 NY Slip Op 06659, 132 N.Y.S.3d 362, 188 A.D.3d 1680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Martin v Zucker (2020 NY Slip Op 06659)
Matter of Martin v Zucker
2020 NY Slip Op 06659
Decided on November 13, 2020
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 13, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

990.2 TP 20-00137

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF BERNARD MARTIN, PETITIONER,

v

HOWARD ZUCKER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RESPONDENT.


NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES, INC., BUFFALO (DIANA C. PROSKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Erie County [Mark A. Montour, J.], entered January 24, 2020) to review a determination of respondent. The determination denied a prior approval request for a Quantum Q6 Edge power wheelchair with power tilt, swing away joystick mount and attendant control on the ground that medical necessity was not established.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on September 17 and 18, 2020,

It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: November 13, 2020

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 06659, 132 N.Y.S.3d 362, 188 A.D.3d 1680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-martin-v-zucker-nyappdiv-2020.