MATTER OF MARKS v. Marks

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF MARKS v. Marks

217 N.E.2d 684, 17 N.Y.2d 787

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 5, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 217 N.E.2d 684 (MATTER OF MARKS v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF MARKS v. Marks, 217 N.E.2d 684, 17 N.Y.2d 787 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

*790 Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Bergan dissent and vote to modify by directing that the sentence to jail be held in abeyance pending the psychiatric examination directed by the Family Court, and reconsidered in the light of what such examination may disclose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

*790 Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Bergan dissent and vote to modify by directing that the sentence to jail be held in abeyance pending the psychiatric examination directed by the Family Court, and reconsidered in the light of what such examination may disclose.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 N.E.2d 684, 17 N.Y.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-marks-v-marks-ny-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack