Matter of Maria G. G. U. v. Pedro H. P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Maria G. G. U. v. Pedro H. P.

138 A.D.3d 873, 28 N.Y.S.3d 347

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 2016

Docket2015-01604

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.3d 873 (Matter of Maria G. G. U. v. Pedro H. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Maria G. G. U. v. Pedro H. P., 138 A.D.3d 873, 28 N.Y.S.3d 347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Thomas A. Rademaker, J.), dated February 5, 2015. The order denied the mother’s motion, in effect, for leave to renew her prior motions for the issuance of an order, inter alia, making specific findings so as to enable the subject children, Marlene G.H., Jose P.H., and Anibal H., to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for special immigrant juvenile status pursuant to 8 USC § 1101 (a) (27) (J).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on the related appeals (see Matter of Marlene G.H. [Pedro H.P.], 138 AD3d 843 [2016], and Matter of Anibal H. [Maria G.G.H.], 138 AD3d 841 [2016] [decided herewith]).

Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Thomas A. Rademaker, J.), dated February 5, 2015. The order denied the mother’s motion, in effect, for leave to renew her prior motions for the issuance of an order, inter alia, making specific findings so as to enable the subject children, Marlene G.H., Jose P.H., and Anibal H., to petition the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for special immigrant juvenile status pursuant to 8 USC § 1101 (a) (27) (J).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on the related appeals (see Matter of Marlene G.H. [Pedro H.P.], 138 AD3d 843 [2016], and Matter of Anibal H. [Maria G.G.H.], 138 AD3d 841 [2016] [decided herewith]).

Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Barros, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.3d 873, 28 N.Y.S.3d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-maria-g-g-u-v-pedro-h-p-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack