MATTER OF MARGOLIS v. Larkin
This text of 286 N.E.2d 916 (MATTER OF MARGOLIS v. Larkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of Joseph S. Margolis, Appellant,
v.
William F. Larkin et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and William H. O'Connell, Respondent.
In the Matter of Joseph S. Margolis, Respondent,
v.
William F. Larkin et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Robert A. Hollis, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Milton Amgott for Joseph S. Margolis, appellant in the first above-entitled proceeding and respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Jesse I. Levine for William H. O'Connell, respondent in the first above-entitled proceeding and Robert A. Hollis, appellant in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.
In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 N.E.2d 916, 30 N.Y.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-margolis-v-larkin-ny-1972.