MATTER OF MARGOLIS v. Larkin
286 N.E.2d 916, 30 N.Y.2d 876
Opinion
In the Matter of Joseph S. Margolis, Appellant,
v.
William F. Larkin et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and William H. O'Connell, Respondent.
In the Matter of Joseph S. Margolis, Respondent,
v.
William F. Larkin et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Robert A. Hollis, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Milton Amgott for Joseph S. Margolis, appellant in the first above-entitled proceeding and respondent in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Jesse I. Levine for William H. O'Connell, respondent in the first above-entitled proceeding and Robert A. Hollis, appellant in the second above-entitled proceeding.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.
In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF MARGOLIS v. Larkin, 286 N.E.2d 916, 30 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1972).
286 N.E.2d 916 (MATTER OF MARGOLIS v. Larkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Packer v. Board of Elections
207 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Donnelly v. McNab
83 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)