Matter of Marenfeld v. Belinfante
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01220 (Matter of Marenfeld v. Belinfante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Matter of Marenfeld v Belinfante |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 01220 |
| Decided on March 5, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 5, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
CARL J. LANDICINO
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.
2022-04714
(Docket No. V-21289-19)
v
Ann Marie Belinfante, et al., respondents-respondents, et al., respondent.
Elliot Green, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.
Jennifer Arditi, Maspeth, NY, for respondents-respondents.
Peter A. Wilner, Jamaica, NY, attorney for the child.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Javier E. Vargas, J.), dated August 24, 2020. The order granted the motion of the respondents Ann Marie Belinfante and Randall Belinfante to dismiss the petition for lack of standing.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Upon the adoption of the subject child in 2008, the petitioner's parental rights ceased (see Domestic Relations Law § 117; Matter of William N. v Maria D., 194 AD3d 939, 939-940). The petitioner, therefore, lacked standing to seek visitation with the child 11 years later (see Matter of Michelle N. v Sandra N., 79 AD3d 753; Matter of Seasia D. [Kareem W.], 75 AD3d 548, 551; Matter of Kevin W. v Monique T., 38 AD3d 672, 673).
The parties' remaining contentions either need not be reached in light of our determination or are without merit.
Accordingly, the Family Court properly granted the motion of the respondents Ann Marie Belinfante and Randall Belinfante to dismiss the petition for lack of standing.
CONNOLLY, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, LANDICINO and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 01220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-marenfeld-v-belinfante-nyappdiv-2025.