Matter of Marcus v. Cohen
This text of 187 N.E. 633 (Matter of Marcus v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order below is affirmed, without costs. The court, however, does not approve of the statement in the opinion of the Appellate Division that the executive committee is given no authority under the Election Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 17) to determine which of conflicting valid petitions should be recognized, if such statement is to be construed as holding that the action of the executive committee is to be given no weight in determining the question. (Matter of Trosk v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 430.)
. The order should be affirmed, without costs.
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 N.E. 633, 262 N.Y. 444, 1933 N.Y. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-marcus-v-cohen-ny-1933.