Matter of Mangold

689 A.2d 722, 148 N.J. 76, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 94
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 12, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 17, 1996, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that EDWARD J. MANGOLD, formerly of BRICK TOWNSHIP, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for acting with a conflict of interest in violation of RPC 1.8(c) by participating in the estate of a non-relative when respondent had drafted the will and served as executor of the estate, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that EDWARD J. MANGOLD is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

*77 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Mangold, 689 A.2d 722, 148 N.J. 76, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 94 (N.J. 1997).

689 A.2d 722 (Matter of Mangold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lanocha
896 A.2d 996 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2006)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stein
819 A.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2003)