Matter of Madden v. Hynes
This text of 119 A.D.3d 689 (Matter of Madden v. Hynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, for a judgment directing the respondent Brian Fischer, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, to calculate the sentence imposed on the petitioner on a judgment rendered against him on November 16, 1994, in the Supreme Court, Kings County, as running concurrently with a certain sentence imposed on the petitioner in Massachusetts, and to credit the petitioner “for the time he served on [the] Massachusetts sentence against his New York sentence,” the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kiings County (Miller, J.), dated May 11, 2010, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner failed to establish his entitlement, inter alia, to a judgment directing the respondent Brian Fischer, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, to calculate the sentence imposed on the petitioner on a judgment rendered against him on November 16, 1994, in the Supreme Court, Kings County, as running concurrently with a certain sentence imposed on the petitioner in Massachusetts (see Fenal Law § 70.25 [4]; People v Fryar, 268 AD2d 595, 596 [2000]; see also Cachoian v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 239 AD2d 118, 119 [1997]).
The petitioner’s contentions regarding a July 1, 2010, order of the Supreme Court, Bungs County, are not properly before this Court (see CFLR 5515 [1]; see also Wenzel v 16302 Jamaica Ave., LLC, 115 AD3d 852 [2014]; W Park Assoc., Inc. v Everest Natl. Ins. Co., 113 AD3d 38, 44 [2013]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A.D.3d 689, 989 N.Y.S.2d 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-madden-v-hynes-nyappdiv-2014.