Matter of Mack v. Cantwell
Opinion
| Matter of Mack v Cantwell |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05250 |
| Decided on September 22, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered:September 22, 2022
534346
v
R. Cantwell, as Hearing Officer of Upstate Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Calendar Date:September 2, 2022
Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ.
Timothy Mack, Coxsackie, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Determination confirmed. No opinion.
Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
174 N.Y.S.3d 287 (Matter of Mack v. Cantwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.