Matter of Lutz v. . Theo. P. Huffman Co.
132 N.E. 913, 231 N.Y. 622, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 791
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Lutz v. . Theo. P. Huffman Co., 132 N.E. 913, 231 N.Y. 622, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 791 (N.Y. 1921).
132 N.E. 913 (Matter of Lutz v. . Theo. P. Huffman Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zechmann v. Canisteo Volunteer Fire Department
651 N.E.2d 1268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Snow v. United States Railroad Administration
209 A.D. 308 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)