MATTER OF LUCOT, INC. v. Gabel

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF LUCOT, INC. v. Gabel

205 N.E.2d 535, 15 N.Y.2d 774

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 4, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 535 (MATTER OF LUCOT, INC. v. Gabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF LUCOT, INC. v. Gabel, 205 N.E.2d 535, 15 N.Y.2d 774 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

15 N.Y.2d 774 (1965)

In the Matter of Lucot, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.
In the Matter of Natken Realty Corp., Appellant,
v.
Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.
In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant,
v.
Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.
In the Matter of Jerome R. Jakubovitz, Doing Business under the Name of J. R. J. Management Co., Appellant,
v.
Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued January 12, 1965. Decided February 4, 1965.

Bernard Buchwald, Harry Bigman, Barry A. Tessler and Peter P. Kenny for appellants.

Beatrice Shainswit for respondent.

Robert E. Herman and Jack Sobell for Division of Housing and Community Renewal, amicus curiๆ.

Joseph G. Blum and Louis Haimoff for Picon Holding Corporation and others, amici curiๆ.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI