Matter of Luca v. Zito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Luca v. Zito

123 A.D.3d 830, 996 N.Y.S.2d 538

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 2014

Docket2014-02400

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.3d 830 (Matter of Luca v. Zito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Luca v. Zito, 123 A.D.3d 830, 996 N.Y.S.2d 538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

*831 Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Bernard Cheng, J.), dated January 30, 2014. The order denied the father’s objections to a prior order of that court (John Raimondi, S.M.), which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order dated January 30, 2014, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to an order issued by a Support Magistrate, which denied his petition for a downward modification of his support obligation. The father failed to meet his burden of establishing a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification (see Matter of Nenninger v Tonnessen, 113 AD3d 619 [2014]; Matter of Gansky v Gansky, 103 AD3d 894, 895 [2013]; Matter of Solis v Marmolejos, 50 AD3d 691, 692 [2008]). The Support Magistrate’s findings were based on credibility determinations and were supported by the record and, thus, should not be disturbed (see Matter of Kennedy v Ventimiglia, 73 AD3d 1066, 1067 [2010]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*831 Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Bernard Cheng, J.), dated January 30, 2014. The order denied the father’s objections to a prior order of that court (John Raimondi, S.M.), which, after a hearing, denied his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order dated January 30, 2014, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to an order issued by a Support Magistrate, which denied his petition for a downward modification of his support obligation. The father failed to meet his burden of establishing a substantial change in circumstances warranting a downward modification (see Matter of Nenninger v Tonnessen, 113 AD3d 619 [2014]; Matter of Gansky v Gansky, 103 AD3d 894, 895 [2013]; Matter of Solis v Marmolejos, 50 AD3d 691, 692 [2008]). The Support Magistrate’s findings were based on credibility determinations and were supported by the record and, thus, should not be disturbed (see Matter of Kennedy v Ventimiglia, 73 AD3d 1066, 1067 [2010]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 830, 996 N.Y.S.2d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-luca-v-zito-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack