Matter of Lowenthal

135 N.E. 944, 233 N.Y. 621, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1042
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Lowenthal, 135 N.E. 944, 233 N.Y. 621, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1042 (N.Y. 1922).

135 N.E. 944 (Matter of Lowenthal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vann v. Kreindler
78 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Tanbro Fabrics Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
35 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
S & L Vending Corp. v. 52 Thompkins Avenue Restaurant, Inc.
26 A.D.2d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Application of Reconstruction Finance Corp.
106 F. Supp. 358 (S.D. New York, 1952)
Canister Co. v. National Can Corporation
71 F. Supp. 45 (D. Delaware, 1947)
Canister Co. v. National Can Corp.
6 F.R.D. 613 (D. Delaware, 1946)
Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)
43 N.E.2d 817 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . Goldston
143 N.E. 779 (New York Court of Appeals, 1924)