Matter of Lopez v. Stanford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Lopez v. Stanford

144 A.D.3d 1307, 40 N.Y.S.3d 303

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 2016

Docket522872

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 A.D.3d 1307 (Matter of Lopez v. Stanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Lopez v. Stanford, 144 A.D.3d 1307, 40 N.Y.S.3d 303 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Córtese, J.), entered February 2, 2016 in Clinton County, which dismissed pétitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an August 2014 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner appeals. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in August 2016 at which time he was again denied parole release. As such, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mance v Evans, 119 AD3d 1316 [2014]; Matter of Hardwick v New York State Dept. of Parole, 116 AD3d 1332 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Córtese, J.), entered February 2, 2016 in Clinton County, which dismissed pétitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging an August 2014 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and petitioner appeals. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in August 2016 at which time he was again denied parole release. As such, the appeal is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Mance v Evans, 119 AD3d 1316 [2014]; Matter of Hardwick v New York State Dept. of Parole, 116 AD3d 1332 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.3d 1307, 40 N.Y.S.3d 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lopez-v-stanford-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack