MATTER OF LILLIS v. Hard Mfg. Co.

182 N.E.2d 289, 11 N.Y.2d 867
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 182 N.E.2d 289 (MATTER OF LILLIS v. Hard Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF LILLIS v. Hard Mfg. Co., 182 N.E.2d 289, 11 N.Y.2d 867 (N.Y. 1962).

Opinion

11 N.Y.2d 867 (1962)

In the Matter of the Claim of Richard Lillis, Respondent,
v.
Hard Manufacturing Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued March 29, 1962.
Decided April 5, 1962.

Morgan F. Bisselle and Warren C. Tucker for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jorge L. Gomez and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lillis v. Hard Manufacturing Co.
11 N.Y.2d 867 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 N.E.2d 289, 11 N.Y.2d 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lillis-v-hard-mfg-co-ny-1962.