Matter of Liggan v. Rodriguez

2018 NY Slip Op 5554

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 5554 (Matter of Liggan v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Liggan v. Rodriguez, 2018 NY Slip Op 5554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Liggan v Rodriguez (2018 NY Slip Op 05554)
Matter of Liggan v Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 05554
Decided on July 26, 2018
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: July 26, 2018


[*1]In the Matter of STACY LIGGAN,

v

A. RODRIGUEZ, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.


Calendar Date: June 11, 2018
Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ.

Stacy Liggan, Dannemora, appellant pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Koweek, J.), entered October 2, 2017 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of the foregoing, petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled and the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Terry v Annucci, 153 AD3d 1019, 1020 [2017]; Matter of Colon v Venettozzi, 150 AD3d 1498, 1498 [2017]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Devine, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Colon v. Venettozzi
2017 NY Slip Op 4002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Terry v. Annucci
2017 NY Slip Op 6039 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 5554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-liggan-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-2018.