Matter of Liebenstein v. Irani
This text of 125 A.D.3d 970 (Matter of Liebenstein v. Irani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (William P. Warren, J.), dated April 26, 2013. The order granted the mother’s motion for an award of an attorney’s fee to the extent of awarding her an attorney’s fee in the sum of $26,805.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the award to the mother of an attorney’s fee from the sum of $26,805, to the sum of $13,402.50; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the mother was entitled to an award of an attorney’s fee (see Family Ct Act § 651 [b]; Domestic Relations Law § 237 [b]; Matter of Feng Lucy Luo v Yang, 104 AD3d 852 [2013]; Matter of Belle v DeMilia, 19 AD3d 691 [2005]). However, given the equities and circumstances of this case, the relative merits of the parties’ positions, and their respective financial circumstances, an award of an attorney’s fee to the mother in the total sum of $13,402.50, or half the amount awarded by the Family Court, is appropriate (see Judge v Judge, 48 AD3d 424 [2008]; Timpone v Timpone, 28 AD3d 646 [2006]).
The father’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.3d 970, 1 N.Y.S.3d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-liebenstein-v-irani-nyappdiv-2015.