Matter of Lewis v. Bogle

2020 NY Slip Op 1618
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2020·No. 2019-12831·Published

Opinion

Matter of Lewis v Bogle (2020 NY Slip Op 01618)
Matter of Lewis v Bogle
2020 NY Slip Op 01618
Decided on March 11, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 11, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2019-12831 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Justin Lewis, petitioner,

v

Robert Bogle, etc., et al., respondents.


Justin Lewis, East Meadow, NY, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Robert Bogle.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (Brittany R. Gurrieri of counsel), respondent pro se.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents from taking further action in a criminal action entitled People v Lewis , pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Indictment No. 638/19, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter ofHoltzman v Goldman , 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue , 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

CHAMBERS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, BRATHWAITE NELSON and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Lewis v. Bogle, 2020 NY Slip Op 1618 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 1618 (Matter of Lewis v. Bogle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)