Matter of Lewis

132 A.D.3d 1017, 16 N.Y.S.3d 790
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 2015
DocketD-65-15
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 132 A.D.3d 1017 (Matter of Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Lewis, 132 A.D.3d 1017, 16 N.Y.S.3d 790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Neal R. Lewis was admitted to practice by this Court in 1982. He was previously admitted to practice in Florida in 1978, where he formerly maintained an office for the practice of law.

By order filed February 20, 2015, the Supreme Court of Florida granted Lewis’ uncontested petition for disciplinary revocation, with leave to seek readmission after five years (Matter of Lewis, 163 So 3d 509 [Fla Sup Ct 2015]). This order was premised upon, among other things, Lewis’ failure to maintain certain required trust account records and his conversion of $92,500 in client funds from his attorney trust account. Pursuant to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, “[a] disciplinary revocation is tantamount to a disbarment” (Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, rule 3-5.1 [g]; see Florida Bar v Hale, 762 So 2d 515, 517 [Fla Sup Ct 2000]).

The Committee on Professional Standards now moves for an order imposing discipline in this state pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, Third Department (22 NYCRR) § 806.19 by reason of the discipline imposed in Florida. Lewis has not replied or otherwise appeared in response to the motion, and has accordingly waived his available defenses (see Matter of Halbfish, 78 AD3d 1320, 1321 [2010]; see also Matter of Morin, 131 AD3d 799, 799 [2015]; Matter of Radshaw, 130 AD3d 1139, 1139 [2015]).

We grant the Committee’s motion and further conclude that, under the circumstances presented and in the interest of justice, Lewis should be disbarred in this state (see Matter of Hock Loon Yong, 130 AD3d 1428, 1429 [2015]; Matter of Felli, 116 AD3d 1335, 1335 [2014]; Matter of Goodhart, 56 AD3d 889, 889-890 [2008]).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose and Lynch, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the motion of the Committee on Professional Standards is granted; and it is further ordered that Neal R. Lewis is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further ordered that Neal R. Lewis

*1018 is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Lewis is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that Neal R. Lewis shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys (see Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.9).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Moses
2022 NY Slip Op 04086 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of Christenson
2021 NY Slip Op 07344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Sheppard
2021 NY Slip Op 05004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of McHale
2020 NY Slip Op 2897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Halbfish
144 A.D.3d 1263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Dasent
139 A.D.3d 1315 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.3d 1017, 16 N.Y.S.3d 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lewis-nyappdiv-2015.