Matter of Lester
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 35245(U) (Matter of Lester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Surrogate's Court, Queens County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Matter of Lester 2019 NY Slip Op 35245(U) September 17, 2019 Surrogate's Court, Queens County Docket Number: File No.2003-4438/F Judge: Peter J. Kelly Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. I Present: HON. PETER J. KELLY SURROGATE
SURROGATE'S COURT: QUEENS COUNTY -------------------------- -- ---------X Accounting by Howard Lester, Patricia Lester and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the Executors of the Estate of
DAVID MINKIN, File No.2003-4438/F
Deceased,
for advanced payment of legal fees pursuant toSCPA2111. -------X
This is an unopposed petition pursuant to SCPt 2111 by David Adler, Esq.,
as Guardian ad Litem for the infant, Pablo Briger, for the advance payment of legal
I fees for services rendered to his ward.
The Guardian ad Litem expended 315.50 hours on this accounting proceeding
representing his ward for the period September, 2011 through August, 2014, at
which time he rendered a final report and his appointm~nt ceased due to his ward's
emancipation. The gross principal reported in the acco+t exceeds $420,000,000.00
million dollars, the vast majority of which is contained ii a family limited partnership
(FLP). Despite the expiration of five years since his strvices were terminated, the
Guardian ad Litem has not been paid a legal fee. rhis is primarily due to the
I [* 1] I complex, protracted course of litigation taken by the reipective parties in this highly
contested accounting.
The Guardian ad Litem protected his ward's inlerests in this proceeding by
filing an answer to the petition, performing an assiduou review of the pleadings and
papers submitted in support of and, in opposition to, tht petition, making numerous
lengthy court appearances at preliminary and pretrial ,conferences, obtaining and
reviewing voluminous discovery including over 150,00~ documents produced from
November 2011 through August, 2012, attending FCPA 2211 examinations,
participating in motion practice, appearing before a ourt appointed Referee for 1 conferences, motions and decisions on discovery relate~ issues, engaging in written
I and telephonic communications with respective counsel, and preparing and filing his
final report.
The Guardian ad Litem, who is among the blst of his peers, has been
admitted to practice in New York since 1981 and hlis practice consists almost
exclusively of trusts and estate matters. He has served. as President of the Queens
County Bar Association and chaired that organization'~ Trusts and Estates section
for over twenty five (25) years. He is a member of t1e Executive Committee for
Estates and Trusts with the New York State Bar Association and lectures on trusts
I [* 2] I and estates practice and has published numerous articles in various publications
including the New York State Bar Journal and the Qw~ens Bar Bulletin. He is AV
Preeminent rated by Martindale-Hubbell. His expertise is unquestioned.
The Court, in considering the factors set forth in Matter of Potts, 213 AD 59,
aff'd 241 NY 593 and Matter of Freeman, 34 NY2d 1, t9 wit: (a) the time and I
legal services required and spent (b) the difficulties of q~estions involved (c) the skill
required to handle the problems presented and the Guardian ad Litem's
experience, ability and reputation, (d) the nature of the services rendered, (e) the
amount involved, (f) the responsibility involved and (g) the results obtained, sets the
Guardian ad Litem's fee in the sum of $118,312.50 for the representation of his ward
I to be paid from the estate assets.
Submit order.
Dated: September 17, 2019
I [* 3]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 35245(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-lester-nysurctqueens-2019.