Matter of Leon W. (Creedmoor Psychiatric Ctr.)
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Matter of Leon W. (Creedmoor Psychiatric Ctr.)
2026 NY Slip Op 04314
July 8, 2026
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
In the Matter of Leon W. (Anonymous), appellant. Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, respondent.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Decided on July 8, 2026
2025-12235, (Index No. 500989/25)
Cheryl E. Chambers, J.P.
Barry E. Warhit
Laurence L. Love
Susan Quirk, JJ.
Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Garden City, NY (Eben Hill, Jill Kroll, and Timothy Riselvato of counsel), for appellant.
Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Mark S. Grube and Joshua N. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 33.03 for permission to administer a course of medical treatment to a patient without his consent, the patient appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Andrea S. Ogle, J.), dated June 10, 2025. The order, after a hearing, granted the petition for the duration of the patient's continuous confinement upon his current admission.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner, Creedmoor Psychiatric Center, commenced this proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 33.03 for permission to administer antipsychotic and other medications to Leon W. (hereinafter the patient), over his objection. After a hearing, the Supreme Court granted the petition for the duration of the patient's continuous confinement upon his current admission. The patient appeals.
As the patient concedes, since the patient's involuntary confinement under the corresponding retention order has expired (see Matter of Leon W., __ AD3d __ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2025-12229; decided herewith]), this appeal is academic (see Matter of Raymond E. [South Beach Psychiatric Ctr.], 242 AD3d 68, 70; Matter of Talbot V. [Kingsboro Psychiatric Ctr.], 192 AD3d 1123, 1124). The patient contends, however, that this Court should apply the exception to the mootness doctrine to reach his unpreserved contention that he was deprived of a fair hearing by the Supreme Court's questioning of witnesses (see generally People v Yut Wai Tom, 53 NY2d 44, 58; People v Morales, 246 AD3d 941, 942).
The exception to the mootness doctrine permits an appellate court, in its discretion, to consider the merits of an academic appeal where "the controversy or issue involved is likely to recur, typically evades review, and raises a substantial and novel question" (Matter of Joshua J. [Tameka J.], 44 NY3d 394, 402 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, contrary to the patient's contention, this matter does not warrant the invocation of the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Jonathan S. [Creedmoor Psychiatric Ctr.], 238 AD3d 1155, 1156; Matter of Daniel C. [South Beach Psychiatric Ctr.], 207 AD3d 539, 540).
CHAMBERS, J.P., WARHIT, LOVE and QUIRK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Leon W. (Creedmoor Psychiatric Ctr.) (Matter of Leon W. (Creedmoor Psychiatric Ctr.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.