MATTER OF LEON v. Meehan

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF LEON v. Meehan

490 N.E.2d 546, 67 N.Y.2d 613, 499 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16717

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1986·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 935). We add that neither petitioner’s bare denial of the violent acts with which he was charged nor the other averments contained in his papers were sufficient to entitle him to a trial in the article 78 proceeding on the issue of bad faith.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 935). We add that neither petitioner’s bare denial of the violent acts with which he was charged nor the other averments contained in his papers were sufficient to entitle him to a trial in the article 78 proceeding on the issue of bad faith.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.

MATTER OF LEON v. Meehan, 490 N.E.2d 546, 67 N.Y.2d 613, 499 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16717 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

490 N.E.2d 546 (MATTER OF LEON v. Meehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related