Matter of Leland
This text of 175 N.E. 333 (Matter of Leland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order should be interpreted as requiring the payment of the purchase price directly to the United States Trust Company, the substituted trustee. So interpreted the irregularities in the proceeding are formal rather than substantial.
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur; Kellogg, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 N.E. 333, 255 N.Y. 607, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-leland-ny-1931.