Matter of Layla C. C. (Rolando C.)

2019 NY Slip Op 870
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
Docket2017-08787
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 870 (Matter of Layla C. C. (Rolando C.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Layla C. C. (Rolando C.), 2019 NY Slip Op 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Layla C. C. (Rolando C.) (2019 NY Slip Op 00870)
Matter of Layla C. C. (Rolando C.)
2019 NY Slip Op 00870
Decided on February 6, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 6, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2017-08787
2017-08791
(Docket Nos. B-33963-10, B-33964-10)

[*1]In the Matter of Layla C. C. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services, et al., respondents; Rolando C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Chanel C. C. (Anonymous). Heart Share Human Services, respondent; Rolando C. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2)


Michael E. Lipson, Jericho, NY, for appellant.

Wingate Kearney & Cullen, LLP, Brooklyn, NY (Ashley Hawes of counsel), for respondents.

Joan N.G. James, Brooklyn, NY, attorney for the child Layla C. C.

Rhonda R. Weir, Brooklyn, NY, attorney for the child Chanel C. C.



DECISION & ORDER

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from two orders of the Family Court, Kings County (Alan Beckhoff, J.), both dated July 12, 2017. The orders denied the father's motion for leave to file late papers relating to an earlier order of the same court dated November 27, 2015, which, inter alia, terminated his parental rights to the subject children.

ORDERED that the orders dated July 12, 2017, are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, we agree with the Family Court's denial of the father's motion. To the extent the father's contentions relate to matters beyond the scope of the issues decided in the orders appealed from, they have not been considered.

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 384
New York SOS § 384

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-layla-c-c-rolando-c-nyappdiv-2019.