Matter of LaRosa v. Kahn

2018 NY Slip Op 1059
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2018
Docket2017-10613
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1059 (Matter of LaRosa v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of LaRosa v. Kahn, 2018 NY Slip Op 1059 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of LaRosa v Kahn (2018 NY Slip Op 01059)
Matter of LaRosa v Kahn
2018 NY Slip Op 01059
Decided on February 14, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 14, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
SHERI S. ROMAN, J.P.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-10613 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Hugo LaRosa, petitioner,

v

Barbara Kahn, etc., et al., respondents.


Hugo LaRosa, Albion, NY, petitioner pro se.

Timothy Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), respondent pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent Barbara Kahn.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Barbara Kahn, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to determine the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of conviction of that court rendered July 10, 2012, in a criminal action entitled People v LaRosa , commenced in that court under Indictment No. 1735/11, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been rendered academic in light of the determination of the subject motion in an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 28, 2017.

ROMAN, J.P., LASALLE, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 8022
New York CVP § 8022(b)
§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-larosa-v-kahn-nyappdiv-2018.