Matter of Kylee Y.

132 A.D.3d 1171, 18 N.Y.S.3d 363
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Matter of Kylee Y.. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.3d 1221
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 29, 2015·No. 517691·Published

Opinion

Lahtinen, J.P.

Appeals from two orders of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered September 6, 2013, which, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act articles 10 and 10-A, continued placement of the subject children and continued an award of supervised visitation to Timothy Z.

In orders entered in March 2013, Family Court provided *1172 Timothy Z. with visitation, supervised by petitioner, of his twin children (born in 2008). The requirement that petitioner supervise visitation was continued in the September 2013 orders from which these appeals were taken and Timothy Z. argues that such requirement is not supported by a sound and substantial basis. We recently dismissed as moot his appeals challenging the supervision provision in the March 2013 orders because his visitation rights had been subsequently terminated in unappealed November 2014 orders (129 AD3d 1221, 1222 [2015]). For the reasons set forth therein, the current appeals are also moot.

Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Kylee Y., 132 A.D.3d 1171, 18 N.Y.S.3d 363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

132 A.D.3d 1171 (Matter of Kylee Y.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Kylee Y.
129 A.D.3d 1221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)